https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/src/julia.h#L588
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 2:16:01 PM UTC-4, Stephen Chisholm wrote: > > Yichao, could you explain why this is unsafe? Do you know of an > alternative which is safe? > > On Monday, 20 June 2016 16:31:29 UTC-3, Yichao Yu wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Stephen Chisholm <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > While helping out with >> > >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37913625/call-julia-svd-from-c/37929076#37929076 >> >> > I noticed jl_tuple2 was removed in >> afd4eb038dcd9fa3e512509f4c332a9e7763ba59 >> > by Jeff Bezanson while refactoring tuples. Just wondering if anyone is >> able >> > to help me find an alternative. Below is what I used to be able to do. >> My >> > current work around is to use jl_eval_string("(2,2)"), but I'm hoping >> that >> > there is still a way to build the dims parameter without a call to >> > jl_eval_string. >> > >> > >> > double m[] = {1,2,3,4}; >> > >> > jl_value_t *array_type = jl_apply_array_type(jl_float64_type, 2); >> > jl_tuple_t *dims = jl_tuple2(jl_box_int64(2), jl_box_int64(2)); >> >> FYI, this is generally unsafe. >> >> > jl_array_t *jl_m = jl_ptr_to_array(array_type, m, dims, 0); >> > >> > >> >
