(I'm just untangling some confusion on my end. Is the following correct?)
In 0.4, array dimensions were printed like this:
julia> zeros(2,3)
2x3 Array{Float64,2}:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
In 0.5, the "x" is replaced with a "×":
julia> zeros(2,3)
2×3 Array{Float64,2}:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
but apparently this character isn't a multiplication, but the cross-product
operator:
julia> 2×3 # copy/paste from above
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching cross(::Int64, ::Int64)
in eval(::Module, ::Any) at ./boot.jl:234
in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:92 [inlined]
in (::Base.REPL.##1#2{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:46
But to get this character you type `\times`, although 'times' is (according to
http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/mathematical-operations/) the
name for "*", but this is the symbol for the `cross()` function...
So wouldn't it be more logical to report the size of arrays using "by"?
julia> zeros(2,3)
2 by 3 Array{Float64,2}:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0