[julia-users] Re: A workaround to use "." to access class member functions - is it unJulian?

[Zhong Pan]

OK, I admit, it's ugly. :-) 

Now I realize it's also wrong. In the example, the 
inner-constructor-created member function split() cannot see member 
variable "N"; it can only see parameter "n" that is passed in from outside. 
If the code changes N later on, the split() function will be using a stale 
value.