On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 6:34:51 AM CDT Yichao Yu wrote:
> I guess I could register it after some clean up later, given that we had
> FastAnonymous package (which was in a very similar situation, if not
> slightly more undefined than this one, sorry @timholy ;-p )

Hey, no sweat. I agree that FastAnonymous was a (temporarily very useful) 
heinous hack, and that it's main benefit was to annoy Jeff so much that he 
made functions fast. In that one respect, I'll immodestly say that it was a 
brilliant and spectacularly successful package---I dare you to try to match it 
:-).

--Tim

Reply via email to