Hello colleague, On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 10:11:46 AM UTC+2, Tomas Lycken wrote: > > Both instances of Julia are runnable, so I don’t think I deleted something > I shouldn’t have in either folder. > > What has changed to make Julia 0.5 so big? Are there any build artifacts I > can/should prune to reduce this footprint? > my guess it's some cumulative build artefacts:
lobi@orange4:~/julia05/deps$ du -sh * 8,0K arpack.mk 12K blas.mk 4,8G build 508K checksums 4,0K dsfmt.mk 8,0K fftw.mk 4,0K gfortblas.alias 8,0K gfortblas.c 4,0K gmp.mk 4,0K libdSFMT.def 4,0K libgit2.mk 4,0K libgit2.version 4,0K libssh2.mk 4,0K libssh2.version 4,0K libuv.mk 4,0K libuv.version 20K llvm.mk 4,0K llvm-ver.make 8,0K Makefile 4,0K mbedtls.mk 4,0K mpfr.mk 4,0K NATIVE.cmake 4,0K objconv.mk 4,0K openblas.version 4,0K openlibm.mk 4,0K openlibm.version 4,0K openspecfun.mk 4,0K openspecfun.version 4,0K patchelf.mk 328K patches 4,0K pcre.mk 2,0G srccache 8,0K suitesparse.mk 4,0K SuiteSparse_wrapper.c 20K tools 4,0K unwind.mk 4,0K utf8proc.mk 4,0K utf8proc.version 384K valgrind 4,0K Versions.make 4,0K virtualenv.mk
