The Bio.jl Gitter is part of the BioJulia org. It's setup nicely in that none of the other channels within the BioJulia sphere have Gitters so you know which channel to go to. I modeled it after that. It would be interesting if channels like this were setup under the JuliaLang repo, but I am not sure what that means with the ability to share mod powers (usually not that bad from Gitter folk, though it's nice to be able to change the integrations around).
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 3:24:25 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > Chris, Thanks for consolidating efforts and setting things up to set up a > community for all kinds of differential equations. > > I wonder if we should have a DiffEq channel/room on the julia gitter > rather than a new gitter? Just a thought. For now, many projects do have > their own gitter - like Bio.jl. > > -viral > > > > On Aug 26, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Chris Rackauckas <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > This has already been done. As of last night we have JuliaDiffEq where > we have moved Sundials and ODE. DifferentialEquations will follow soon, and > I am talking with the owner of ODEInterface to see if that should go there > as well (and if it should be expanded). > > > > If you have any ideas, open an issue on the Roadmap repo. We should find > out what the other SDE/PDE packages are and coordinate efforts/APIs. The > other SDE packages are pretty basic, and I don't think it would be useful > to deal with simple things like StochasticEuler. Bridge.jl may be > interesting: I know that it may need to be needed by DifferentialEquations > for more easily implementing stochastic integral equations and a few high > weak order methods, so it would be nice to pull it into the group. The idea > would that others could do similar tasks easier if this is all coordinated > together. > > > > My goal is to have DifferentialEquations.jl wrap all of the solvers > here. You can already use Sundials, ODEInterface, and ODE from > DifferentialEquations. More coordination is likely required to make the PDE > packages compatible (and I don't know of very many, JuliaFEM and HP-FEM?). > Probably the toolings for making FEM meshes and things like that should > spawn out to their own package and become more complete. Of course, others > will have their own reason for having compatible APIs. > > > > I just setup a unified Gitter. I think we should have the current ODE > and DifferentialEquations Gitters merge to this JuliaDiffEq one so that way > it will be easier to find help. > > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 3:09:49 PM UTC-7, Christoph Ortner > wrote: > > A separate organisation would be really welcome especially if it means > coordination of efforts on the development of DE-related work. > > > -viral > > > >
