That's a good showing for Julia for the larger matrices? However, for smaller matrices it's a large constant time. Is it including startup/compilation time? Did they not "run it twice"?
On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 8:57:32 AM UTC-7, Páll Haraldsson wrote: > > > I have no relation to this.. > > https://github.com/remore/julializer > > [may not work to transpile Ruby on Rails to Julia - yet, there is an old > package RoR that allows it to work with Julia though.] > > > Interesting benchmarks here ("virtual_module" is transpiled, but "Julia > 0.4.6 not, only to compare, and [can be] a little slower than Python..): > > https://github.com/remore/virtual_module > > > Saw at: > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/Julia/comments/5049pq/a_fresh_approach_to_numerical_computing_with_ruby/ > > [not really about to discuss here much. Fortran to Julia was first, > though.] > > -- > Palli. > > >
