Hi,
I'm using Julia 0.4.6 on OSX El Capitan, and was trying to normalize each
column of matrix, so that the norm of each column becomes 1. Below is a
isolated and simplified version of what I'm doing:
function foo1()
local a = rand(1000, 10000)
@time for i in 1:size(a, 2)
a[:, i] /= norm(a[:, i])
end
end
foo1()
0.165662 seconds (117.44 k allocations: 232.505 MB, 37.08% gc time)
I thought maybe the array copying is the problem, but this didn't help much:
function foo2()
local a = rand(1000, 10000)
@time for i in 1:size(a, 2)
a[:, i] /= norm(slice(a, :, i))
end
end
foo2()
0.131377 seconds (98.47 k allocations: 155.921 MB, 36.66% gc time)
and then I figured that this ugly one runs the fastest:
function foo3()
local a = rand(1000, 10000)
@time for i in 1:size(a, 2)
setindex!(a, norm(slice(a, :, i)), :, i)
end
end
foo3()
0.013814 seconds (49.49 k allocations: 1.365 MB, 4.86% gc time)
So I overheard a few times that plain for-loops are faster than vectorized
code in Julia, and it seems it's allocating slightly less memory, but it's
slower than the above.
function foo4()
local a = rand(1000, 10000)
@time @inbounds for i in 1:size(a, 2)
n = norm(slice(a, :, i))
@inbounds for j in 1:size(a, 1)
a[j, i] /= n
end
end
end
foo4()
0.055522 seconds (30.00 k allocations: 1.068 MB, 15.14% gc time)
Is there a solution that is faster and less uglier than foo3() and foo4()?
Thinking of an equivalent implementation in C/C++, I should be able to
write this logic without any heap allocation. Is it possible in Julia?
Thanks,
Jong Wook