On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 1:17:38 AM UTC, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday, September 2, 2016 at 8:51:21 PM UTC-4, K leo wrote > Much easier to call C++ from Julia, particularly with the Cxx.jl package > <https://github.com/Keno/Cxx.jl>. Performance-wise, it shouldn't > matter, but it is always easier to write glue code in a higher-level > language than in a lower-level language. > As far as I understand: https://github.com/barche/CxxWrap.jl should also be [as, not faster or slower] fast. Meaning runtime speed (of not development speed). As I need neither, I've only looked a bit into, interactive C++ seems awesome in Cxx.jl, but is it fair to say the other package is [more] stable? Cxx.jl requires 0.5, that is just around the corner, I'm not sure the state then. -- Palli.
