readdir is POSIX: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/readdir.3.html
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Chris Rackauckas <rackd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here it is: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3376. Would > changing to ls be back on the table? > > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 9:41:55 AM UTC-7, Stefan Karpinski > wrote: >> >> There are POSIX standards for new programming language function names? >> But yes, ls() could be a better name. >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Adrian Lewis <adrian...@hushmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > You can find a thread/issue where this is discussed. Some group >>> decided to call it readdir() and like it more. I just got used to it. I >>> think it's silly, but it's just syntax. >>> >>> I thought it might be an idea to stick with POSIX standards. >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 4:40:03 PM UTC+1, Chris Rackauckas >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 7:36:18 AM UTC-7, Jacob Quinn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> readdir() >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Adrian Lewis <adrian...@hushmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In the filesystem package, if we have pwd() and cd(), why do we not >>>>>> have ls()? >>>>>> >>>>>> Aidy >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>
