I think he's talking about the fact that this specifically is more than
Github: it also requires using pandoc and
If the repo somehow ran a build script when checking the PR so that way all
you had to do was edit the .bib and index.md file, that probably would
lower the barrier to entry (and could be done straight from the browser).
That would require a smart setup like what's done for building docs, and
probably overkill for this. It's probably easier on the maintainer side
just to tell people to ask for help. (And it's better to keep it as a .bib
instead of directly editing the Markdown/HTML so that way formatting is
always the same / correct).
On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 12:14:21 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
> What do you propose? Github is about as simple as we can do, considering
> also the complexity of maintaining something from thr project side. There
> are plenty of people around the community who are happy to walk you through
> the process of making a pull request, and if it's not explained in enoug
> detail then we can add more instructions if it would help. What have you
> tried so far?