On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:10:57 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
> Since it uses the in-place assignment operator .= it could be made to work
> as desired, but there's some designing to do.
The problem is that it doesn't know that * is a matrix multiplication until
In any case, I don't think there's a huge amount to be gained from special
syntax here. Unlike broadcast operations, matrix multiplications cannot in
general be fused with other operations. So you might as well do A_mul_B!.