i know i shouldn't, but i'm kinda angry at this "1." notation. saving one character really worth losing readability? also leading to errors like this. personally, i would not even allow this syntax at all.
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 1:11:38 PM UTC+2, Michele Zaffalon wrote: > > I am confused by the type of the result of `1.*80`, which is `Int64`, > despite the fact that `1.` is `Float64`, and that `Float64(1)*80` is a > `Float64`: >
