It could well be libflint-13.dll is the problem. It's just a copy of the
other flint dll, so you can make that any way you like. Just copy the file
and rename the copy.

As for the dll DependencyWalker claims is missing, I don't know what it
does and it might not be relevant. We are mainly looking for dlls in the
left hand pane that it says are missing that appear related to gcc,
pthreads, arb, flint, gmp, mpfr, pari, arb, msys, etc. Anything that looks
like an MS dll can probably be ignored.

Bill.

On 27 October 2016 at 18:57, digxx <diger_d...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Actually:
> libflint-13.dll      14,156 KB
> is missing for me
>
> also is .git\
> under Nemo
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 18:32:48 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey Sarnoff:
>>
>> With 64-bit Win7, in my directory for Julia packages
>>
>> under Nemo:
>> .git\
>> benchmarks\
>> deps\
>> doc\
>> local\
>> src\
>> test\
>> .gitignore
>> .travis.yml
>> appveyor.yml
>> LICENSE.md
>> README.md
>> REQUIRE
>> todo.txt
>> windows_build.txt
>>
>> in deps:
>> antic\
>> arb\
>> flint2\
>> build.jl
>> mpfr-3.1.3.tar.bz2
>> mpir-2.7.2.tar.bz2
>> pari-2.7.4.tar.gz
>> patch-alloc-2.7.4
>>
>>
>> under local:
>> lib\
>>
>> in lib:
>> libarb.dll           22,350 KB
>> libflint.dll         14,156 KB
>> libflint-13.dll      14,156 KB
>> libpari.dll           6,067 KB
>> libgmp-16.dll           673 KB
>> libmpfr-4.dll           451 KB
>> libwinpthread-1.dll      84 KB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that windows_build.txt is preset for 32-bit Windows;
>> for 64-bit machines, windows_build.txt should be this:
>>
>> # start of file
>> # For Windows 64
>>
>> wget http://mpir.org/mpir-2.7.2.tar.bz2
>> tar -xvf mpir-2.7.2.tar.bz2
>> cd mpir-2.7.2
>> ./configure --enable-shared --disable-static --enable-gmpcompat
>> --build=core2-w64-mingw64 LDFLAGS=-static-libgcc ABI=64
>> make -j
>> cd ..
>> wget http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/mpfr-3.1.4.tar.bz2
>> tar -xvf mpfr-3.1.4.tar.bz2
>> cd mpfr-3.1.4
>> ./configure --with-gmp-build=/home/User/mpir-2.7.2 --enable-shared
>> --disable-static
>> make -j
>> cd ..
>> git clone https://github.com/wbhart/flint2
>> https://github.com/wbhart/antic
>> cd flint2
>> ./configure --enable-shared --disable-static
>> --with-mpir=/home/user/mpir-2.7.2 --with-mpfr=/home/user/mpfr-3.1.4
>> --extensions=/home/user/antic
>> # edit Makefile
>> # in CLFAGS replace -ansi -pedantic with -std=c99
>> # add -mtune=core2 -march=core2 to CFLAGS
>> # add -I/home/User/flint2 to INCS
>> # ensure EXTRA_SHARED_FLAGS contains -static-libgcc -shared
>> -Wl,--export-all-symbols
>> make -j
>> cd ..
>> wget http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unix/pari-2.7.6.tar.gz
>> tar -xvf pari-2.7.6.tar.gz
>> cd pari-2.7.6
>> export PATH=/home/user/mpir-2.7.2/.libs:$PATH
>> LDFLAGS=-static-libgcc CFLAGS="-mtune=core2 -march=core2" ./Configure
>> --with-gmp-include=/home/user/mpir-2.7.2 
>> --with-gmp-lib=/home/user/mpir-2.7.2/.libs
>> --host=x86_64-pc-mingw
>> cd Omingw-x86_64-pc
>> make gp
>> cd ../..
>>
>> # For Windows 32:
>>
>> # replace x86_64 with i686 throughout
>> # replace ABI=64 with ABI=32
>>
>> # end of file
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 8:09:33 PM UTC-4, Bill Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, there is one more thing you could do. Download
>>> DependencyWalker [1] and run it on libarb.dll in place where it currently
>>> is in your Nemo/local/lib directory. It's bound to complain a lot, and
>>> there will be lots of yellow flags. But what we are looking for is missing
>>> dependencies that we are responsible for.
>>>
>>> Bill.
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.dependencywalker.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 October 2016 at 02:04, Bill Hart <goodwi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only thing I can think of to suggest is try it again from scratch
>>>> in Julia-0.4 so we can rule out the dlls being corrupted on our website
>>>> somehow.
>>>>
>>>> I can't think what else could be wrong, unless something else changed
>>>> in Julia itself on Windows, between versions 0.4 and 0.5.
>>>>
>>>> Jeffrey, are you using 64 bit Windows with Julia 0.5?
>>>>
>>>> Bill.
>>>>
>>>> On 26 October 2016 at 23:02, digxx <diger...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's weird coz in julia 0.4.x it was running without any problems...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to