Will these improvements make into Base.Test ?

On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 12:53:37 AM UTC-4, Spencer Russell wrote:
>
> I think in general the culture in the Julia community is very pro-testing, 
> which I really appreciate. I saw your post recently about PyTest, but I’m 
> generally pretty happy with the built-in `@testset` / `@test` system, and 
> just wanted some lightweight convenience functionality that wouldn’t 
> require people to restructure their existing tests.
>
> -s
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 4:30 AM, pdo...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
>
> Hey Spencer,
>
> I like this! 
>
> I have recently started a testing-related package as well, maybe you've 
> noticed (https://github.com/pdobacz/PyTest.jl). It seems that both 
> packages could work together and complement quite seamlessly, so I'll 
> definitely give yours a try. 
>
> BTW, do you think there is much demand for Julia testing tools?
>
>
>

Reply via email to