Other developers may feel differently, but for me the comments you added are of the sort that many college programming instructors would find objectionable. Many coders find that putting in comments that reiterate what the code already says unnecessarily clutters the source code. The comments also do not follow Javadoc syntax. IMHO the comments should simply state the purpose and leave out unnecessary mention of number of parameters and return values.
just my opinion,
Larry
On 8/31/06, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sent a source code file for OpenJUMP with some revised comments
yesterday. I realized this morning I used the wrong type of single
line comment marker. The attached file has fixed this problem.
Sorry about that.
The Sunburned Surveyor
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
