I guess too, this is the sense of having them separated. I now at least someone who developed a gis-webservice (e.g. if you need a buffer you simply send the geometry from your local program to the service and it returns to you the buffer geometry), thus he does not care about the gui functions.
stefan Sunburned Surveyor schrieb: > Is it possible that JUMP/OpenJUMP is packaged in 2 separate JAR files to > allow developers to reference only the API JAR file when they need to > use JUMP's feature model, but aren't interested in the overhead of the > workbench classes? > > I think I vaquely remember Jon mentioning this, and I was wondering if > anyone could confirm that for me. > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
