Stefan Steiniger wrote: Hi,
> of course, i am/we are interested in your evaluation results. [...] > >> I'd also like to know if the DeeJUMP team had any thoughts about > >> Paul's suggestion of tapping into the Java port of PROJ4. It seems > >> like a logical choice for projection code. we finished evaluating the Java port of the proj4 library. I think this sentence describes the situation pretty well (taken from their Homepage): >The Java projection library is a partial port to Java of the popular >proj4 map projection library. >... >Coordinate system and geodetic datum conversion is missing. In our eyes this makes it a bad choice for deegree (and also OpenJUMP), because the key functionality requested by many users and necessary for many applications is conversion between different coordinate systems. Best regards, Andreas -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-11 fax ++49 +228 1849629 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
