Agreed Paul
Andreas Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > I think we're agreed that we use Java5 for the OpenJUMP sources, right? > > I'm just wondering whether there are any objections to me changing the ant > build.xml file to use the source="1.5" and target="1.5" options for the javac > task, because it enables usage of the Java6 compiler, which is much faster. > The > resulting binaries can be used with any Java5 JRE. > > The nightly builds should not be affected as long as a Java5 or Java6 compiler > is used. > > Any objections? > > Best regards, Andreas > -- > l a t / l o n GmbH > Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany > phone ++49 +228 18496-11 fax ++49 +228 1849629 > http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
