Hei Volker, as long as backward compatibility is retained we are always open for suggestions - and in particular if the code improvement is delivered too (e.g. in form of a (eclipse)patch) ;)
cheers, stefan [email protected] schrieb: > Hi *, > > first of all thanks to Larry for correcting and commiting my previous > request! > > so here is my second "Request". I would like to "open" the > SplitLineStringsOp to get easier access to its internals where needed ( > atleast the split-method ). > > One way would be to overwrite the SplitLineStringsOp or to copy the copy > code and stopp annoying you, which is a fair workaround for me. > > But if you interested in such just cosmetic changes, I would like > suggest some changes, which - of course - wouldn't change the current > behaviour of the involved classes. > > Regards > > volker > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
