On 29.06.2011 09:11, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Right, that works... but sometimes it doen't. I cannot understand why > one of these multilinestring is converted into multipolygon and not the > other (anyway, I checked the spec and it seems that none of them isValid) : > > MULTILINESTRING ((139 229, 139 154, 197 148, 254 232, 139 229), (176 > 184, 173 106, 297 106, 295 193, 176 184)) > MULTILINESTRING ((298 256, 298 311, 365 311, 365 256, 298 256), (334 > 223, 334 281, 387 281, 387 223, 334 223))
the first rings are counterclockwise. so the code only found holes and failed. fixed in rc4. praise the <insert your idol(s) here> for thorough testers, thx ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
