Hi, > 8-memory usage decreases after new layer command (even in 1.4.2) > because EditTransaction memory is cleared. Be careful, it also means > that undo chain is broken after such a command. > why so? wasn't the core fully re/undoable at a time?.. ede I did not change this part and did not check why Layer operation break the undo chain. There is also a ticket from Larry Becker about it : 2728360
Would be interesting to have a deeper look and try to preserve the undo chain in this case. However, operations like dropping a layer should not be undoable. Michaël > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
