On 11.04.2012 10:46, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > On 11.04.2012 02:45, Stefan Steiniger wrote: >> as this goes to my svn folder I remove parts of the header. >> >> I am actually not sure if we should use the SVN list for exchanging >> emails? but that's a decision of you - the "active developers". >> >>> for all icons related to the same plugin (agree it would be better) >>> maybe icons can be resized, depending on where they are. >>> We did that recently for "new project" and "open" icons in the main menu. >>> Resized image are not as neat as the source image, but at least, >>> alignments are preserved >>> which, in my opinion, is the rule n° 1 if we want a UI which looks serious. >> >> yes - I agree with Michael: Icons in the toolbars need to have same size. >> I once changed the whole GUI to famfamfam icons (took me 2 days) - but >> then discarded all my changes as some icons where not available (to GIS >> specific) and also the set had a different size & style. >> >> It's either all or nothing with respect to icons - from my point. >> Hence, re-sizing would be necessary. >> > > this dynamic resizing is an ugly matter. let me see if we can add a limited > multiresolution icon support to icon. maybe adding a MultiIcon Interface > which defines a getIcon(Dimension Method) this way signalling what size is it > intended for. >
this was actually easier than expected. as both icon are used for different tools FeatureInfoTool vs. FeatureInfoPlugin i simply assigned each the correctly sized icon instead of using the FeatureInfoTool icon which would have to be resized. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
