mhm.. the only thing I could imagine why we want backward compatibility is for existing plugins. But I am not sure if there is actually any plugin that would use the method... maybe though (thinking of ISA tools???)
stefan Am 29.08.12 14:17, schrieb Michaël Michaud: > Hi >>> Just curious. I wonder why back compatibility is so important >>> for a software which is both cheap and easy to install (deployment issue ?) >> what exactly do you mean Michael? > Just wondered what is the problem for current users to migrate to an > updated version of OpenJUMP including the new method. > > Michaël > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
