On 24.09.2012 02:50, Stefan Steiniger wrote: > Not sure if you refer to a new voting tool, but > > Am 23.09.12 17:25, schrieb Michaël Michaud: > ... >> *@All* Another related question is bug id 3446420 (xml in .zip containing >> shapefile). >> Wonder if removing .xml from "known" extensions would be sufficient >> to solve it. If it is, I would vote for this solution to close this bug. >> *I submit this to a vote* > if it is sufficient, then just lets remove the xml = +1
if you want to remove it only during zip opening i agree. which dataset formats have a xml extension btw? >> >> *@All* Another remark (which is not directly related to zip but maybe to >> r2867) >> File-based layer are now loaded with their extension. I'd rather exclude >> extension from the layer name. >> An example I have in mind is loading data from a file into a database which >> would be more fluent if we had no extension. >> *I submit this to a vote* > +1 (without extension is better) i remember doing this in case the same file based dataset exists in two formats (eg. Layer.jml and Layer.shp). it simply visually tells you where the layer came from, so disagreed. renaming the layer is easy enough and using OJ to "convert" datasources is probably the seldom use case opposed to editing. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
