Hi Ede,
>> OK, done.
>> I also removed previous the former jts version from pom to have a single
>> JTS jar in the distribution.
>> Let's check the snaphots now...
> probably a _bad idea_.. the dependency in pom is necessary to build OJ!
>
> all we do is build against the old, but package the new ;) .. there is a 
> possibility to also build against the lib/*.jar but that's not needed as we 
> just temporarily package your jts snapshot
OK, I see. Build and Package phases are not as related as I thought.
I revert my change in pom.xml.
Building with a jar and packaging with another is probably not a good 
practice though :-(
Any better idea ?

Michaƫl
>
> ..ede
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to