Thanks Peppe.  Perhaps I'll find some time soon to fix this.

Larry

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe Aruta <giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it>
wrote:

> Jukka, Larry
> I tried the patch that Larry sent but is seems not working with OpenJump.
> At least with my machine Ubuntu/OpenJDK. It the other members of our
> community agree, I vote to comment out Road Curve tool untill further
> solutions.
> A workaround to draw roads is to use Tools>Analysis> Offset curve tool, by
> Michael, which generate parallel lines so selected one
> Peppe
>
> 2015-01-21 23:53 GMT+01:00 Larry Becker <becker.la...@gmail.com>:
>
>> 1.       Python tools feels somehow like a promising way for writing new
>>> drawing tools. The Python part of the tools look almost understandable for
>>> non-programmer and I suppose that Python is the most common geospatial
>>> scripting language at the moment. *However, if I understand right for
>>> creating new tools Python is not enough but also some java programming is
>>> needed*. By the way, the Road Arc tools does not work with latest
>>> snapshots and it makes so bad a jam that only killing the process helps.
>>> The error from the console window:
>>>
>>
>> @Jukka,  I assume you are referring to the following line from Startup.py:
>>
>> #tools can be defined in java only - as in this orphaned JUMP Note tool
>>
>> The comment is badly worded.  It should say #tools may also be defined in
>> java and activated here - as in this orphaned JUMP Note tool  There are
>> many examples of defining a new drawing tool in jython only.
>>
>> While I don't currently have my OpenJump development platform up to date,
>> I did diff the SkyJUMP copies of  two attached files and bring them up to
>> date with the new Shift key feature of the Road Curve tool (it is maddening
>> to draw long straight stretch of road without it!).  If one of the
>> developers has a few minutes, they can see if it fixes the issue.  If it
>> doesn't we can comment out lines 100 through 109 in startup.py to
>> deactivate the Road tool.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Larry Becker
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <
>> jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was searching tools for making some CAD alike drawing and studied what
>>> we have. I found:
>>>
>>> 1.       Some of the Python tools in the standard delivery has
>>> CAD-alike features (rotated rectangle, Arc tool).
>>>
>>> 2.       Peppe has made a CAD tools plugin that adds some CAD tools
>>> into the default digitizing box.
>>>
>>> 3.       Kosmo GIS has a special CAD toolbox with about 15 tools.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quick comments:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1.       Python tools feels somehow like a promising way for writing
>>> new drawing tools. The Python part of the tools look almost understandable
>>> for non-programmer and I suppose that Python is the most common geospatial
>>> scripting language at the moment. However, if I understand right for
>>> creating new tools Python is not enough but also some java programming is
>>> needed. By the way, the Road Arc tools does not work with latest snapshots
>>> and it makes so bad a jam that only killing the process helps. The error
>>> from the console window:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" Traceback (innermost last):
>>>
>>>   File
>>> "C:\oj_test\OJ_18\OpenJUMP-20150116-r4270-PLUS\lib\ext\jython\RoadTool.py",
>>> line 201, in handleDeActivation
>>>
>>> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'actionPerformed'
>>>
>>> Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" Traceback (innermost last):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.       I would rather place the additional CAD tools to their own
>>> tool box because they do not behave exactly as the standard tools. Many of
>>> the OJ keyboard shortcuts stop working when a CAD tools is selected. On the
>>> other hand, the SHIFT key does not alter the behaviour of CAD tools as
>>> planned in most cases. The draw vertical/horizontal tool, tools for drawing
>>> closed linestrings and the annotation layer tool would be nice additions to
>>> OJ PLUS. Annotation tool might need some revisiting.
>>>
>>> 3.       Many of the Kosmo tools are fine. I wonder how difficult it
>>> would be to adapt some of those for OJ. For example the “Continue lines
>>> until they cross” tools is simple and clever and I do not remember such
>>> tool in other open source GIS. “Draw perpendicular” works well also with
>>> circles and Bezier curves but it would be nice to have a sister tool “Draw
>>> tangent”.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> None of these CAD tools had a tool for my need. Or perhaps the “Draw
>>> with commands” tool in Kosmo has but I could not discover the right syntax
>>> even I found the manual
>>> http://www.kosmoland.es/public/kosmo/v_2.0/docs/Extension_Herramienta_CAD.pdf.
>>> What I would like to do feels simple to me:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -          Draw a point or first vertex to coordinates x/y
>>>
>>> -          Draw next point or vertex by angle and distance or to next
>>> given coordinates
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I know I can workaround the manual feed of coordinates effectively by
>>> using WKT but not the angle + distance alternative.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
>>> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
>>> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
>>> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
>> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
>> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
>> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to