Hi Ede, No problem, if you revert the code in the core, I'll revert the code in Roadmatcher.
But maybe changing back the method signature will now break the core... let's see. Michaël Le 12/12/2016 à 12:06, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit : > On 07.12.2016 20:46, Michaël Michaud wrote: >> a third problem arose with WorkbenchContext#getErrorHandler where you >> changed the return type from ErrorHandler to ErrorHandler2 >> I thought this is OK (called covariance isn't it), but fort a reason, I >> get compilation errors. Maybe you know why. I replaced ErrorHandler >> usage by ErrorHandler2 in RoadMatcher. > hmm.. yeah right. i should probably revert that in core. the return value is > part of the method signature, changing that breaks API, my fault. means you'd > have to revert that change, but other legacy code might still work then. ok > for you? > > ..ede > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
