ok, read it again.
and yes we could do that, but *no* it is very dirty. we should rather copy the
translation for the few generic translations we will add initially from keys
where english or your own language suggests it is _really_ used generically
contextwise.
..ede
On 22.03.2017 15:22, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> On 22.03.2017 15:09, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>> Using com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.GenericNames we don't need even
>> to add new ui.Generics.<string>s to language/jump files.
>> For instance, "Attributes" string could be a new line into GenericsNames:
>>
>> public static String
>> ATTRIBUTES=I18N.get("org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.tools.generate.LinearReferencingOnLayerPlugIn.attributes");
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
