Hi all, The Olive installation doc with VM ware workstation.
Thanks & Best Regards -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5 Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Juniper Olive. (Hernan) 2. Re: Juniper Olive. (Peder Bach) 3. juniper mpls mtu (cp) 4. Re: juniper mpls mtu (Daniel Roesen) 5. MPLS LDP (sunnyday) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:09:05 +0200 From: Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive. To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HI All: Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could you give me any input about that soft.. ? or where i can find more information. Thanks and regards.. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:34:04 +0200 From: "Peder Bach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive. To: Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Hernan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI All: > Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could you give > me any input about that soft.. ? or where i can > find more information. > > Thanks and regards.. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:15:30 -0400 From: "cp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu To: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu? I've been testing using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means the ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute bypass. I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably missing something. Any information is appreciated. -Chip ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:19:51 +0200 From: Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:15:30AM -0400, cp wrote: > I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper > calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu? I've been testing > using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu > reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if > mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means the > ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see > additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute > bypass. I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably > missing something. Any information is appreciated. Exactly that's the case as far as I'm aware. They have chosen a default "enough for most usages" headroom. Then again, defaults may change, so it's good engineering practice to set MTUs for all protocols explicitly. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:49:09 +0300 From: "sunnyday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP To: "Juniper-Nsp" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hello I have configured mpls ldp in my network and I want all ip traffic to go through mpls. I have issued the command mpls ldp ip-forwarding but the traffic seems to go through isis when I trace route to an ip I see no label assignment. After that I have issued the mpls ldp ip-forwarding hosts-only and all /32 traffic was going through mpls but all the /30 or other subnets Where going through isis.Any help would be appreciated. Thank you ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5 ******************************************
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
