Thank you.

It's seems that Vpi 1 doesn't generate warning. Now I'm using Vpi 1 and Vci 33 
and the message is no longer displayed. 

Regards,
David


-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Peter E. Fry
Envoyé : jeudi 19 juin 2008 14:52
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [j-nsp] ATM VC Reserved

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> hi all,
>  
> I've configured VCI 13 on an ATM interface and now I've got this 
> warning :
>  
> commit and-quit
> [edit interfaces at-7/0/0]
>   'unit 4'
>     warning: Warning: vci 13 is reserved - will not support in future 
> releases
>  
>  
> Do you know why ?

  IIRC, VPIs 0-1 and VCIs 0-31 are reserved for signalling. 
Most systems allow assignment withing these ranges, but attaching to a switch 
with a UNI PVC of 0/16 would be a bit odd, for instance.  Check out the ATM 
forum docs (I believe some may be publicly available).
  As to why Juniper would threaten to do more than drop a warning about it, it 
could be an attempt at behavior modification.  I doubt they have a SAR that 
doesn't allow reserved assignments; they may wish to avoid potential collisions.

Peter E. Fry

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

*********************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended 
solely for the addressees. 
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
Messages are susceptible to alteration. 
France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or 
falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it 
immediately and inform the sender.
********************************
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to