On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Derick Winkworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fiddling with the MX for a POC-like session, I found a couple of things > others may find interesting... > > 1) On etherchannel bundles, traffic is distributed per destination-mac, per > source-mac, or both. Unfortunately, this is not configurable on a per-link > basis, only globally. So, for us, this means we will be using both... > > "forwarding-options hash-key family multiservice ..."
No option to distribute by src/dst IP, TCP/UDP src/dst port, MPLS label ? > 2) On an IRB interfaces, there is the annoying requirement of specifying a > layer-2 interface in a static arp definition. This annoying requirement > remains true even in the case of a multicast-mac. For some reason, > configuring static ARP means the MX can't learn that MAC address... which is > highly inconvenient when you need to use a multicast MAC address (like > active/active multicast mac firewall configurations). Kinda like port-security ? > 3) To be 100% compatible with Cisco's PVST+, you need to use "force-version" > and make sure you are configured for STP and not rapid-pvst... Any references whether this is the case with EX-series ? Rubens _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
