I would say common practice - if you're using VRF's in a multivendor
environment with draft-rosen for instance, I believe you MUST use the
same IP address in the lo0.x interface, as the "other" vendor expects
the lo0.0 address (which the Juniper won't send). Of course all Juniper
network won't have that issue and you're free to choose.
cp wrote:
Does anyone see a problem or have any experiences with using the same
loopback unit 0 IP addresses for other loopback unit in VRFs? Is this a
common practice? For example, loopback unit 0 is 172.16.1.1/32 and
lives in inet.0. loopback 425 is 172.16.1.1/32 lives in a vrf.
-Chip
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp