> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:07:46 -0600 > From: Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:34:53AM +0200, Arda Balkanay wrote: > > Hi List,
> > We have several MX series which will be used for peering issues > > (upstream > peering, customers, inter-as mpls peerings etc). > Which > > junos release do you think is the most stable one to use for this kind > > of purpose ? I'm checking current PRs but experience will be great > > input for > > 9.2R3 is above and beyond the best JUNOS for MX960 in my experience. It > fixed a lot of outstanding issues and has been quite stable so far. But you need to be aware that the 4-byte ASN/Confed issue is present in 9.2R3. See JTAC Tech Bulletin PSN-2009-01-200 for the details or see the NANOG thread at http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg14393.html or the NANOG presentation at http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Monday/Davidson_asn4_breaks_light_N45.pdf -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
