* [email protected] > The protocol next-hop seems to be resolvable : but it is not directly > known in our IGP. So you have a recursive lookup til you find a > forwarding next-hop.
Yes, exactly. What surprises me, however, is that EGP routes is considered at all when resolving indirect next-hops of iBGP routes. I have problems coming up with a scenario where that behaviour would be desireable, and the JUNOS documentation I quoted is also quite clear on the fact that it is intra-AS OSPF, IS-IS, RIP, or static routes that are supposed be used for next-hop resolving. The behaviour I expect (and want) is for routes that come with a next-hop that is not resolvable through my IGP should be ignored outright and _not_ be placed in the PFE, even though the next-hop is resolvable using a BGP route. Regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
