On Monday 16 March 2009 11:58:49 pm [email protected] wrote: > Could you expand a bit on the traceroute bug and how this > is visible?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/16700 PR/396280 Although JTAC say this issue is resolved in 9.3R3 for the 9.3 code base. However, as mentioned before, we need 9.4 at a minimum to support the enhanced CFEB's. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
