On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:11:04PM -0600, Jonathan Call wrote: > > Why do you believe this is a hash settings issue? The egress load > seems evenly distributed between the two active interfaces. When the > ae0 interface plateaus at 1Gbps , both physical interfaces plateau at > ~500Mbps. I've also read that layer-4 hashing can be CPU/memory > intensive. Would just layer-3 be sufficient?
If hashing takes any memory you're doing it wrong, this is stateless operation with no memory impact and no CPU impact since its done in hardware. > The other end is a Cisco, but since this issue is with egress traffic > I don't really think that is important, unless I do change the > load-balancing settings. Are you able to get 1Gbps on any one individual link, if you bring it down to only 1 active ae member? And, just to get the obvious question out of the way, you aren't congested on the egress port from the Cisco are you? :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
