I believe, the way virtual links are defined is to establish a link to a destination in another area...In an environment where the trabsit area is a stub, its not a good idea to agree to carry virtual link based on a defult route (as Type 3 LSA)...
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paulo Estante <[email protected]> wrote: > If I undestand your question correctly, OSPF prefers intra-area routes > over inter ones. Note that inter-area prefixes are chosen in a > distance-vector fashion (no dijkstra). > > Paulo > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Hoogen<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have been trying to look around but any more information would be > great... > > > > The only thing I understand it can't be done is because RFC says so.. and > > because just in case the disconnected area has ASBR type 5 external lsa's > > cannot pass through. > > > > Anyone has any more information other than this? > > > > -Hoogen > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
