On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
EX has a ton of missing features which are blocked like this. Which is
yes
actually better than how it used to be, where they would commit and then the box would crash and require a physical powercycle to recover.
wee... I guess? :(
The sad part is that IPv6 support (to say nothing of firewall support, which is still extremely lacking on all fronts) isn't roadmapped until
check out snmp support as well, good times and spinlocked snmpd, weee! ( forget the order but something like snmpwalk the standard v2 accessible mib tree and boom snmpd spins itself into the ceiling, until 9.5<something> code)
2011 on "big EX". Why Juniper doesn't want this platform to have a
'big ex' means?? 8XXX? isn't the idea with the EX you get a lower end routing platform in the 32/4200 and can scale it up with VC's until you want to grab an 8200?
chance to succeed is beyond me, I guess they figure it's no fun if they don't wait for the competition to catch up.
smells like 6500... _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
