I thought this referred to IPSEC VPNs, not VRF-based VPNs..... Moreover, the routing-instance is related with VPNs, but is more than this... Also the virtual-router should have its own services (DHCP and more) running independently.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Terje Krogdahl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:55:46PM +0300, Mircho Mirchev wrote: > > Seems that DHCP server is working only in default routing-instance, but > this > > is not stated anywhere. > > I'm afraid the docs say it is not supported, although it is not very > clearly formulated: > > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/junos-security-admin-guide/jd0e15056.html#dhcp-server-op-overview > > "DHCP is not supported on interfaces that are part of a virtual > private network (VPN). " > > -- > Terje Krogdahl > > All roads lead to Rome > - A clearly confused router (R. Perlman) > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
