Dear Truman Thanks for clearity. We are using policers with limited brust size. I was just wondering whether shaping can be done using DiffServ or not. I have tried using classifer or scheduling but didn't get succcess.
Thank You Regards, Ramesh On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Truman Boyes <[email protected]> wrote: > On a regular PIC (ie. non IQ/IQ2/etc...) you do not have individual queues > per IFL. Therefore you can only queue on a single aggregate (ie. IFD). > > You may want to explore using policers on outbound based on DSCP/ToS > markings. I know it's not exactly what you are looking for, but you should > be able to make some TCP-friendly policers that have some defined burst > sizes. As this would be policing there would not be queueing involved so a > delay buffer would not be possible. This is the best you will get with a 4FE > card. > > Kind regards, > Truman > > > On 17/12/2009, at 7:28 PM, Ramesh Karki wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > Thanks for your response. There is no option like GTS (Cisco feature) for > > traffic shaping on juniper regular PIC. Current i have 4FE regular PIC, > need > > to shaped the traffic and i am looking for configuring exact scheduling > > matching all traffic with best effort for 64K and delay buffer upto 128K. > > > > Thank You > > > > Regards, > > Ramesh > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Ramesh Karki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi experts, > >> > >> I m trying to shape traffic on Regular 4FE-PIC with JunOS 9.2. I think > >> shaping on regular PIC can only be done using DiffServe queue. > >> > >> if someone have already done or configured, configuration will be really > >> appreciated. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> Ramesh > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
