Thanks for the feedback. With vlan routing interfaces (vri), anyone using it in different virtual routers and zones.
quoc --- On Mon, 3/15/10, matthew zeier <[email protected]> wrote: > From: matthew zeier <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Trunking on SRX > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 10:28 AM > This is exactly what we're doing at > Mozilla on 10.1R1.8. Boxes have been up since 10.1R1.8 > was loaded 21 days ago: > > m...@phx-fw1> show system uptime > node0: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Current time: 2010-03-15 17:27:33 UTC > System booted: 2010-02-22 05:57:50 UTC (3w0d 11:29 ago) > Protocols started: 2010-02-22 05:58:59 UTC (3w0d 11:28 > ago) > Last configured: 2010-03-11 00:29:07 UTC (4d 16:58 ago) by > dmoore > 5:27PM up 21 days, 11:30, 1 user, load averages: > 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > node1: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Current time: 2010-03-15 17:27:33 UTC > System booted: 2010-02-22 06:25:30 UTC (3w0d 11:02 ago) > Last configured: 2010-03-11 00:29:05 UTC (4d 16:58 ago) by > dmoore > 5:27PM up 21 days, 11:02, 0 users, load averages: > 0.06, 0.03, 0.00 > > > > >> Hi, > >> Looking to trunk (vlan tagging) on the SRX > 3600 to reduce the number of physical interfaces required. > Anyone currently using it that can provide feedback or > issues? Good or bad idea? > >> > >> Doesn't appear to be any details of vlan tagging > in the srx docs so not sure if it's officially supported. > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
