Hi Arda, Thats great. I was looking at using this but was not sure if the CoS settings would override the MF classifier but looking at the config it makes sense now.
Nick From: Arda Balkanay [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 April 2010 11:15 To: Nick Ryce Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J2320 CoS and QoS you can use multifield (MF) classifiers by matching source-destination characteristics of the traffic with a firewall filter and assign that traffic to a specific forwarding class. firewall family inet filter MF-TEST term T1 { from { <anything to match traffic> } then { forwarding-class expedited-forwarding; accept; } } use the firewall filter in interface interfaces ge-0/0/0 unit 0 { ... family inet { filter { input MF-TEST } address ... } } you already have schedulers per forwarding class... so matching backup traffic and assigning it to best-effort might help in your case. Cheers Arda On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nick Ryce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Guys, Is it possible to mix CoS and QoS per interface on a 2320 running 9.4? Current CoS configured as follows:- class-of-service { forwarding-classes { queue 0 best-effort; queue 1 expedited-forwarding; queue 2 assured-forwarding; queue 3 network-control; } interfaces { ge-* { scheduler-map cos-lumison; unit * { classifiers { dscp default; } } } } scheduler-maps { cos-lumison { forwarding-class network-control scheduler nc-scheduler; forwarding-class expedited-forwarding scheduler voice-scheduler; forwarding-class best-effort scheduler data-scheduler; forwarding-class assured-forwarding scheduler assured-scheduler; } } schedulers { voice-scheduler { transmit-rate percent 60; buffer-size percent 60; priority strict-high; } data-scheduler { transmit-rate percent 25; buffer-size percent 25; priority low; } nc-scheduler { transmit-rate percent 5; buffer-size percent 5; priority high; } assured-scheduler { transmit-rate percent 10; buffer-size percent 10; priority low; } } } Customer would also like to use qos to prioritise backup traffic from a source range to a destination range. Is it possible to then use a filter to prioritise the traffic from source to destination? Many Thanks Nick -- Nick Ryce Network Engineer Lumison 08451199999 P.S. do you love Lumison? Why not take a moment and vote for us? http://bit.ly/Vote_Lumison -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ________________________________ -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
