On Tue, 11 May 2010, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: |->On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:38:41PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: |->> Richard's suggestion to consider the MX80 is a good idea, |->> especially if you're looking at having two for redundancy. |->> My main concern is JUNOS 10.x, especially since you're |->> somewhat new to Juniper. But if you can hang in there, the |->> code will improve with time. The MX80 is definitely great |->> for peering... it's a role we're considering for it here, |->> since it's too pricey to stick in the metro :-). |-> |->Eh... Given his incredibly simple sounding config, personally I'd just |->just get the Trio/MX80 cards and call it a better long term investment. |->Depending on your exact config they're somewhere between a little and a |->lot cheaper than the old DPCs, and they integrate a lot of the things |->that you previously needed services DPCs for too. Now if only they'd fix |->the damn BGP bugs, we're seeing 4-5 minute stalls from flapping a single |->IBGP session in 10.1 tests.
Aye, incredibly simple is right. Intersting notes about the MX80, it might be a better option long term. Thanks. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
