On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Chris Evans <[email protected]>wrote:
> I have real concerns with juniper. We are primarily a Cisco shop and are > using juniper devices here and there. I have to honestly say, anymore > Cisco > code is way more stable than Junos. I'm always finding major bugs in junos, > yet any Cisco bugs we are finding are usually cornercase ones. > > The latest junos bug I've found is that with the mx platform igmp snooping > doesn't work at all in 10.0 and other train releases. In 10.3 all mulicast > is broken when using irb interfaces. Seriously is no one testing? > > I hope they get their act together soon.... > To play safe, we are still using 9.3R4.4 on all M & MX (also on packet mode J), and 10.0S6.1 on EX4200/3200 in production area, cause we don't need new features for now, plus looks like these codes run well in our simple environment. (knock the wood...) No sure how long we can keep it, but things are too scary to 1. upgeade to 10.x for M&MX 2. upgrade (or I should say "downgrade") to flow-mode for J. Regards, M~ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
