After more research I found that I need to do traffic shaping and hierarchical CoS.. The unfortunate part is that with the MX you need the enhanced queuing cards and for the M series you need at least an IQ2 pic to do these features.. All fine and dandy except for the cost, the Juniper solution costs about 4 to 5x as much as compared to using an ASR1K solution. We do not have the J series as a buyable platform currently and I'm not going to take the effort to research, test and certify it when I have other choices already..
I have to sit back and think that Juniper is getting their A$$es handed to them right due to the cost of their products. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Chris Evans <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm still researching hardware selection right now but it looks like I need > at minimum iq2 pics to support hierarchical cos. I think those are rather > expensive which would push me to the Cisco asr1k series.. bums me out I have > to get special high end hardware on juniper boxes to support this featur > when almost every Cisco platform supports this on base hardware. > > It looks like I would need the enhanced queueing cards for our headend mx > devices. > > Guess I'll be looking at alternative platforms or trying to come up with > another answer. > On Oct 5, 2010 11:44 PM, "Dale Shaw" > <[email protected]<dale.shaw%[email protected]>> > wrote: > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
