Hi all, We are working on a new colo deployment and we are trying to choose between the MX80 and the MX240. With our current budget the MX240 is definitely a stretch over the MX80. On paper, the MX80 has more than enough horsepower to meet our needs for the foreseeable future, however I was wondering if anyone has any comments on their experience with it in production. We are looking at the MX80-AC chassis with the 20x1Gb SFP MIC card with a mixture of SX and copper SFPs.
Our immediate needs: - IPv4 and IPv6 - BGP (3-4 full tables, 1-2 partial tables) - OSPF - Sampled netflow - SNMP monitoring Has anyone had problems running the MX80 in their network, with the features above or with other commonly used features? Other than access to the MS-DPC blade and the expandability for the larger MX systems, are there any significant benefits to using a MX240 over the MX80? Please feel free to send offlist responses if you feel they are more appropriate. Thank you, Tim _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
