Jose,
JUNOS RR can have multiple cluster-ids. So do this:
1/ R3 cluster-id 1.1.1.1 to serve R1+R6,
2/ R3 cluster-id 2.2.2.2 to serve R2+R5,
3/ R4 cluster-id 1.1.1.1 to serve R1+R6,
4/ R4 cluster-id 2.2.2.2 to serve R2+R5
-- and I think you'll meet the requirement of "RR unique cluster-id redundancy".
Rgds
Alex


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose Bejarano" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 12:21 PM
Subject: [j-nsp] RR unique-cluster-id redundancy


Sorry, issue should say "RR unique-cluster-id redundancy"

Hi,

Topology
                             RR 1.1.1.1
         |----R1----------------R3-------------R5-------|
         |     |                 |              |       |
         |     |                 |              |       |
         |-----R2---------------R4----​---------R6-------|
                             RR 2.2.2.2

R3 Route-Reflector Cluster-id 1.1.1.1
R4 Route-Reflector Cluster-id 2.2.2.2
R3 1.1.1.1 BGP group client:   R1+R6
R3 BGP group no-client:  R2+R5
R4 2.2.2.2 client:   R2+R5
R4 BGP group no-client:  R1+R6
R1+R2+R5+R6 BGP group ibgp: R3+R4
iBGP full-meshed R3-R4

How to build redundandy in this scenario ?
Goal is to build RR redundancy using unique-cluster-id, RR R3 and R4 should have clients but R1,R2,R5,R6 may not be clients of different RR.

Feedabck and configuration examples are wellcome...
Cheers,

--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to