On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:31:59PM +0000, Charlie Allom wrote: > Hello, > > has anyone else seen these messages: > > Dec 2 13:29:43 sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:45 sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:50 sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 100 and next page id 100 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:51 sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:54 sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:58 sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:29:59 sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 103 and next page id 103 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:30:02 sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 103 and next page id 103 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:30:03 sw0.cll mib2d[843]: LIBJSNMP_NS_LOG_WARNING: WARNING: AgentX > master agent failed to respond to ping. Attempting to re-register. > Dec 2 13:30:06 sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:30:08 sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 104 and next page id 104 > for fw -559038737 > Dec 2 13:30:10 sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 104 and next page id 104 > for > > ...repeating for up to an hour on a commit on firewall filters? pfem > process also runs at 100% cpu and starts to impact things like SNMP. > > JTAC just can't or wont advance on my case. I'm beginning to think one > of the PFE's is broken somehow.. > > Is there a way to know what firewall filter "-559038737" is?
Clearly not a valid one. What code? Odds are good you should probably just upgrade. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
