On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Ian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/12/2010, at 2:27 PM, Good One wrote: >> I was just thinking about using bla.bla.bla.0/32 (as a loopback address) and >> bla.bla.bla.0/31 on some point to point interfaces. Not sure which one is >> ugly and not useable at the moment. But would love to hear from you guys... > > It'll work, but expect complaints from Windows users that their traceroutes > star out (* * *) at those hops.
That's a nice feature of using .0 and .255 addresses on what used to be class C space: Windows bots won't DoS you. Rubens _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
